Against the background of a generally more left and environmentally aware electorate in Scotland than the rest of Britain left wingers in Scotland have hoped that they could look to the Scottish Socialist Party (SSP) for a clear policy of how to respond to the issues in the forthcoming General Election. Sadly, this is not to be found.

The SSP was a massively positive development, formed over 20 years ago and for a period united much of the radical and Marxist left in Scotland. The SSP won significant electoral support under PR with six Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) in the 2003 general election and over 10% of the vote in Glasgow. However, the split in the SSP over a decade ago around the role of Tommy Sheridan and his foolish and self-indulgent court cases led to a significant crisis and major loss of membership and electoral support.

Rebuilding?

The SSP has attempted to rebuild itself in recent years and had risen to over 400 members, which although well down on its 3,000 members in its early period still makes it a significant force on the Scottish left. Many members are serious activists in trade unions and campaigns across Scotland. The alternatives promoted by Sheridan and his erstwhile supporters, including the split-ridden sects like the CWI and SWP [1], number only a few dozens; while the left wing ‘Campaign for Socialism’ in the Labour Party, with barely a few hundred supporters, is largely inactive, never meets and increasingly relies on the tiny pro-Brexit Communist Party of Britain and the Morning Star newspaper as its political prop. In the Scottish Labour Party, there is no comparison with the thousands of Labour-supporting activists mobilised through Momentum in England.

In the aftermath of the 2014 referendum where the SSP campaigned vigorously for independence in working class communities, over 1,000 people requested to join the Party but were not consolidated into membership. Instead the Party leadership has moved in an increasingly propagandistic direction, with street stalls petitioning for a £10 per hour minimum wage being at the centre of recent activities rather than developing a broader strategy for independence and socialism. The Party leadership increasingly see their role as ‘battening down the hatches’, keeping the membership active through street stalls, criticising the SNP and Labour for their inadequacies, and waiting for another independence referendum or a strike wave. The Party has only made a belated turn towards environmental issues and largely focuses on economic (‘class’) demands such as a £10 per hour minimum wage.

The leadership of the SSP put a 1700-word statement on the General Election to its conference of individual members in Edinburgh at the start of November. This was carried by about two to one by the less than 100 members attending, the conference having been postponed at the last minute due to the desire to be present at a massive pro-independence rally in Glasgow addressed by Nicola Sturgeon as leader of the SNP. The statement, which has not been published at all on the Party’s website, sets out the SSP leadership’s position on Brexit. In summary this is: despite the SSP supporting Remain as the ‘lesser evil’ against xenophobia in the 2016 referendum, the narrow 52/48 result should be accepted as a ‘legitimate democratic outcome’.

The SSP therefore consciously puts itself in the same position on EU membership as the Brexit Party and Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party (as the Tories are styled in Scotland) in supporting Britain’s immediate exit from the EU with no caveats or conditions, or even recognition that Scotland didn’t vote for Brexit! The SSP leadership statement opposes Labour and the SNP’s support for a second referendum on the terms of EU membership and quotes approvingly from supporters of the ‘Lexit’ position on the British left, who fail to recognise Brexit as an overwhelmingly right-wing project.

Abstentionism

In relation to the General Election, the leadership of the SSP recommended to the November conference not standing any SSP candidates. The election on 12 December is seen as ‘a Brexit election’ in which ‘class politics’ would not be able to get a voice. Brexit is seen by the leadership of the SSP as: ‘an issue upon which the SSP has nothing sufficiently unique to campaign on’.

This pathetic statement fails to recognise that Brexit itself is a key class issue, with the Tories trying to force through an abrupt rupture with the EU, if necessary on a catastrophic ‘No Deal’ basis, replace the EU relationship with a free trade deal and economic alignment with Trump’s America, introduce reactionary controls on immigration, and with the further prospect of dismantling any limited protection of welfare, labour and environmental rights [1].

The argument for not standing SSP candidates also relates to the relative weakness of the Party financially and organisationally. But the leadership statement goes further politically, in declining to give any advice on whether the SSP should endorse any candidates in the 59 Scottish parliamentary constituencies on 12 December. The main campaigning priority of the SSP over the last couple of years has been to petition for an immediate £10 per hour minimum wage. Such a policy is actually at the centre of the Labour Party’s manifesto. The SSP statement concentrates its main fire on the Labour Party however. SSP leadership figures claimed to the Conference that ‘Corbynism’ and Labour are ‘dead’, despite the most radical Labour manifesto for decades. This has been followed up by anarticle entitled ‘Labour isn’t working – let’s get Independence done!’ by Colin Fox, national spokesperson of the SSP, in Scottish Socialist Voice and sent to all SSP members in which Fox focuses his and the SSP’s criticism on the Labour Party in this election [2].

The SSP conference statement also makes clear that support for any Scottish Labour Party candidate should not be countenanced, stating: “as a guide for members we have previously ruled out formally recommending a vote for any unionist candidate, even if they are on the Left”.

Instead it is proposed that support can only be given to candidates who support an “Independent Socialist Scotland”. Due to the flight of independence supporters from the Scottish Labour Party, in practice this limits potential SSP support to only a couple of SNP candidates, such as Chris Stephens, the outgoing SNP MP for Glasgow South, who is explicitly a socialist and independence supporter but has a close fight with Scottish Labour to retain his seat.

In the vast majority of Scottish parliamentary constituencies, the SSP leadership is therefore completely silent on who members should consider voting for, or on what principles they should base their choice. A clarification given at the conference about the ridiculous abstentionist nature of this position was that individual branches of the SSP can, if they wish, decide whether they choose to endorse candidates – though this is nowhere expressed in the 1,700 words of the approved national abstentionist position.

This abstentionist position has confined the SSP to the sidelines in the General Election. It is unlikely to be able to benefit from the leftward shift represented by the Labour Party manifesto, the growth of support for independence and the political turmoil that will undoubtedly follow the general election on December 12 in Scotland. Even in the context where a speedy second independence referendum is the prize that Nicola Sturgeon is able to take home for support for support for a minority Labour government, the SSP will not be seen to have contributed much to getting to that place.

Instead there will be more focus by the Scottish left on the need for the Radical Independence Campaign, which played a key role in mobilising for yes across working class communities last time round, to come centre stage and make an even greater success next time round. Sadly, but not unexpectedly, there is not a mention of this important campaign in the latest ‘Election’ issue of the SSP’s Scottish Socialist Voice.

The opportunity opened by the hosting of COP26 in November 2020 also places a huge responsibility on the Scottish left to turn significantly towards the climate change and ecological movements and build a massive presence during COP26 in Glasgow, working with ecosocialist and anticapitalist activists across Scotland and Europe and beyond.

The SSP is not yet completely irrelevant, but in deciding to stand outside this General Election it has taken a significant step backward. This has disheartened some SSP activists but the battle remains to continue to build a united left force in Scotland over the coming period.

Mike Picken, 9 December 2019

Footnotes

[1] The CWI is the Committee for a Workers International which was originally established by the British Militant Tendency in the 1970s but has had major splits several times since, including the loss of most of its Scottish members within the SSP; most recently it went through a further international split where the minority rump in England appears to have expelled the majority – the remnants of the Militant tendency are to be found all over the Scottish left including within the SSP, but the only organisations are the grandly titled ‘Socialist Party Scotland’ (SPS) and ‘Revolution’ groups. The SWP is the British Socialist Workers Party which has also undergone a series of schisms over the last 8 years primarily over its response to rape allegations; the losses also included the majority of Scottish members. Both the CWI and SWP have been strong supporters of Brexit, the Tory-led exit of the UK from the EU, though they claim to support a left wing ‘Lexit’ without immigration controls that is not on offer from the Tories. The RS21 group that left the SWP also support Brexit but have evolved a better position on voting in the UK election, similar to that advocated in the previous article by Mike Picken. Some former SWP activists launched the RISE electoral coalition and have recently launched a print version of the online journal ‘Conter’, to act as a focus for ‘anticapitalist debate’ in Scotland, but still hold to a pro-Brexit position.

[2] ‘Labour Isn’t working – let’s get Independence done’ by Colin Fox, Scottish Socialist Voice Issue Number 528. The title of this article is actually based on two Tory Party slogans: ‘Labour isn’t working …’ is from the 1979 election when Margaret Thatcher was first elected Prime Minister, and the second is from the main Tory slogan in 2019, which is ‘Let’s Get Brexit Done!’.

• Posted on 9^th December 2019:
http://socialistresistance.org/general-election-2019-exeunt-scottish-socialist-party-stage-left/18859

---

General Election: Scotland at Crossroads

This General Election has been rightly described as the most significant in Scotland in decades and a range of complex and key issues are raised. Whether you are viewing it from inside or outside Scotland there are several key differences with the election in the rest of Britain. Mike Picken gives his personal view on what socialists in Scotland should do.

Brexit

Scotland is overwhelming against Brexit–62% of those voting in Scotland voted to Remain in the EU in the 2016 referendum, with every single local government area showing a Remain majority. Polls show that opposition to leaving the EU is now at over 70%.

While there is some modest scepticism against some EU policies, the main reason for the pro-EU sentiment is that the xenophobia against EU migrants associated with the large Leave voting elsewhere in Britain does not exist to anything like the same extent in Scotland. This is primarily due to a declining population and labour shortages that make the Scottish economy dependent on migrant labour. Scottish opinion is strongly supportive of the EU’s “free movement of people” with a largely welcoming environment to both EU and non-EU migrants alike, including refugees.

The largest group in Scotland supporting leaving the EU actually comes from those supporting independence from the UK, summarised in an unfortunate slogan pandering to this view displayed at the recent conference of the Scottish Socialist Party of ‘Neither London nor Brussels…’ (‘unfortunate’ because you should not equate the working class populations of London and Brussels with the institutions of the UK Parliament and the EU commission also based there – the people who live in those two cities are allies, not enemies!).

The Brexit Party has largely failed to make any inroads, with its solitary MEP elected in June 2019 leaving the party within weeks of being elected. They are only standing in a token number of non-Tory Scottish constituencies in this election.

The British-wide Labour Party’s initial support for implementing some form of Brexit did not go down well in Scotland with the Party crashing to fifth place in the recent EU elections. Labour’s conversion to support for a second EU referendum at the Labour Party Conference in September 2019 has largely come too late to arrest the Party’s declining support and despite the widespread support for federalism in the Scottish Labour Party, the Party largely fails to recognise Scottish distinctiveness in its position on UK membership of the EU.

Support for independence grows

The second key element is that the movement for Scottish Independence remains very strong and increasing in support. The 2014 referendum on Scottish Independence led to a major swing: 25% support for independence 12 months before the referendum increased to 45% overall during the campaign. Independence won majorities in major working-class cities, including Dundee and Glasgow.

Only a major ‘Project Fear’ by the Unionist parties, including Labour, raising the prospect that an independent Scotland would not be (re)admitted to the EU and fears over the uncertainty of the poorly thought out position on a currency, convinced some working class voters leaning towards independence instead to back staying in what seemed at the time to be the relative stability of the UK.

But the narrow 52/48 UK wide decision in 2016 to leave the EU while Scotland voted overwhelmingly to remain has increased what is seen as the ‘democratic deficit’. Support for independence has crept up with current polls indicating around 50%.

This move has been reinforced by the creation of a mass movement on the streets. Regular large demonstrations ranging from tens of thousands in small towns to hundreds of thousands in Glasgow and Edinburgh have been mobilised over the last 18 months. These actions have been overwhelmingly working class in composition. At a smaller level the newly relaunched left-wing Radical Independence Campaign, that unites Marxist and radical supporters of independence across parties, attracted over 500 people to a recent Glasgow conference.

The main electoral beneficiary of this has been the Scottish National Party which surged forward in membership after 2014 to 120,000 members. Proportional to population this is far and away the largest mass party in the UK.

Nevertheless, the SNP remains a notoriously undemocratic and ‘top-down’ party where the membership play little role in policy-making. The SNP has claimed over the last several decades to be aligned with ‘the mainstream of European social democracy’ while the leadership have endorsed a largely neo-liberal set of economic proposals by their ‘Growth Commission’ for a post-independence Scotland.

However, electorally they have become dominant and have now clearly replaced the Labour Party as the principal party of Scotland. The SNP won 50% of the vote and 56 out of 59 Scottish seats in the UK general election in 2015 and despite a small reduction in support retained its leading position in the Scottish Parliament elections of 2016 and the local government and general elections in 2017 (although Scottish elections, unlike UK general elections, are fought under systems of proportional representation and hence lead to minority governance).

Environmental Crisis and Trident opposition

Environmental and peace sentiments are strongly embedded into Scottish politics. Protests in support of the youth climate strikes on September 20^th attracted tens of thousands in Glasgow and Edinburgh with gatherings and demonstrations all over the country. There is a well-established and vociferous school and community environment movement, including in tiny island communities where the natural environment is under massive threat from climate and environmental change. The Scottish Parliament has recently passed a Climate Change Act that claims to be the strongest of any parliament in the world and the decarbonising of energy generation is strongly embedded in a country where natural resources such as wind power are relatively strongly placed to replace conventional means including nuclear.

While the country has previously been highly dependent economically and for employment on oil and gas extraction from the North Sea, there is a widespread understanding that this needs to stop and a ‘just transition’ planned to green technologies. The Scottish government responded to some of this sentiment by banning fracking across Scotland some years ago, though it has yet to legally constitute this

However, while the SNP tries to project itself as environmentally concerned and active, it remains strongly wedded to oil, gas and aviation industries. The recent SNP conference in Aberdeen was exclusively sponsored by BP and Heathrow Airport. The party has previously supported airport expansion across the whole UK, but are under strong pressure on this.

The Scottish Green Party (SGP) has long had representation in the Scottish Parliament and is widely seen as a key part of the growing environmental movement. They are completely independent of the Green Party of England & Wales and strongly support Scottish Independence The SGP are standing 22 candidates in the General Election to highlight the ‘Climate Emergency’.

The focus on environmental issues has been reinforced by the UK government’s decision to host the next UN climate conference (COP26) in Glasgow in November 2020 and there is a growing movement at the grassroots, ranging from local Extinction Rebellion groups through to Friends of the Earth Scotland and the Stop Climate Chaos Scotland coalition, to focus on genuine climate action before and at the summit.

A key element of the increasing sentiment around preserving people and planet, is also seen in the widespread opposition in Scotland to the Trident nuclear missile system of the UK government. Britain’s Trident nuclear submarines are located in the Clyde estuary just 20 miles from Glasgow. The SNP and Scottish Parliament have consistently opposed nuclear weapons and particularly the current Tory plans for a hugely expensive £200 billion replacement for Trident.

Trident replacement was also strongly opposed by the Scottish Labour Party at its conference in 2016 and the Scottish Trade Union Conference (STUC) has also joined forces with the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament to oppose nuclear weapons and demand a defence diversification agency to replace jobs in nuclear weapons industries. But these strong historical position are not reflected in the position of either the overall Labour manifesto or that of Scottish Labour for this election.

Scottish Labour Support in Freefall

All of these specific developments have led to an ongoing crisis of electoral support for the Scottish Labour Party. As recently as the 2010 General Election support for Labour in Scotland actually rose to 42% overall. But since then the Party has declined massively, falling to third place in the general and Scottish elections since then, and to less than 10% in the most recent EU elections losing its MEPs completely for the first time in 40 years.

The two opinion polls for Scotland in the current General Election put Labour support at around 18%, down significantly from the 27% achieved in 2017 and only a little more than half of the Party’s overall polling across Britain as a whole. In an echo of the transition in the early 20^th century from Liberal to Labour in England, this has been dubbed by one former insider and commentator as ‘The Strange Death of Labour Scotland’ (a parody of the title of George Dangerfield’s book: “The Strange Death of Liberal England”).

The reasons are not hard to see. The Corbyn landslide that swept the English Labour Parties in the leadership elections of 2015 and 2016 did not happen in Scotland – in fact Scotland was the onlyarea of Labour Party membership that failed to vote for Corbyn in the 2016 election. The organisation Momentum that spearheaded support for Corbyn elsewhere was not set up in Scotland and the membership of the Scottish Labour Party failed to grow in the way it has in England, despite the historic strength of Labour in being the dominant party of urban Scotland for nearly a century. At around 20,000 members, the Scottish Labour Party is less than one sixth the size of the SNP and probably only about double the size of the Scottish Green Party.

In 1923 a crowd estimated at 250,000 gathered at Glasgow’s St Enoch’s station to see off to London the ten Labour MPs elected for the first time in Glasgow in the Westminster General Election of that year; in his closing rally of the 2017 General Election, Jeremy Corbyn addressed less than 200 people at the other end of Glasgow’s Buchanan Street, with even the then leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Kezia Dugdale, absent. Since then Labour has elected a new leader, Richard Leonard.

Scottish Labour has seen a parade of a long succession of around a dozen weak and inept leaders in the last 20 years. While Leonard was identified as a supporter of Corbyn, the reality is much more complex and he only narrowly won over a more explicitly right wing anti-Corbyn candidate. Leonard has spectacularly failed to galvanise support for Scottish Labour around a radical programme of change and he remains a marginal figure in Scottish politics.

Part of this decline in the Labour electorate is the Party’s steadfast continuation of support for the union with the UK. Indeed not only is Scottish Labour opposed to independence, but is vehemently opposed to the right of the Scottish Parliament even to call a referendum. Scottish Labour has tried to pressurise the British Labour Party to rule out another independence referendum, despite the more positive recognition of reality by the likes of Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell.

Particularly disappointing is that while the Scottish Labour Party has reached agreement with the British Labour Party that it will campaign for Remain in any second EU referendum, the recent Manifesto of Scottish Labour explicitly repeats the support of the British Labour Party for nuclear weapons and Trident replacement, against the conference policy of the Scottish Labour Party itself! The SNP have not been slow to highlight the inconsistencies of Scottish Labour’s approach to EU membership, a second independence referendum and support for nuclear weapons.

A further problem with supporting Labour in Scotland is that the Labour Party seems to have failed to recognise the last 20 years of devolution and the reality of 12 years of an SNP-led Scottish government. The British Labour Party’s general election campaign has been attempting to highlight policies that would make a difference in England – such as abolition of university tuition fees, a massive house building programme, free social care for the elderly, banning fracking, free prescriptions and dental checks, defence of the NHS etc – which don’t apply through the Westminster government in Scotland.

Indeed most of these policies have already been introduced in Scotland under the SNP governments since 2007. The previous Labour/LibDem coalition in Scotland from 1999-2007 was actually synonymous with a massive expansion of private finance in public services, the legacy of which still exists. The highlight of the Scottish Labour manifesto was to commit to free school meals, a policy that cannot actually be implemented by Labour at Westminster and will have to await the Scottish Parliament elections in May 2021.

While British Labour under Corbyn has shifted to the left and attacks the SNP on austerity and privatisation, the reality is that apparently radical Labour policies unveiled every night on the ‘national’ TV news channels attacking the Tories and get away from Brexit issues, actually have very little relevance to Scottish voters and just reinforce support for the SNP’s claims as to its ‘progressive’ governmental record.

Corbyn’s election campaign visit to Scotland was run in a ham-fisted way by the Labour Party apparatus, with major confusions and contradictions over the policy on an independence referendum ruthlessly exploited by the Tories and SNP alike. Labour even failed to announce its policy on the roll out of free fibre broadband in a place where it would have had a major impact – Scottish rural, island and remote communities – and waited until two days after Corbyn’s visit to Scotland to announce it … in England!

Scottish Labour has been bleeding significant electoral support, primarily to the SNP but also on a unionist basis to Tories and LibDems. Ironically, polls show that as the Labour vote has declined, the proportion of Labour voters that would support Scottish Independence in a future referendum has increased from around one third to nearly half of Labour supporters; yet hardly a single figure in the Scottish Labour Party even supports Scottish self-determination, and virtually no leading figure in the whole of the British Labour Party supports Scottish Independence per se.

Both the SNP and Labour regularly indulge in politically sectarian party ‘tribalism’, with Labour seeing ‘the Nats’ as a bigger enemy than the Tories, while SNP figures attack Labour universally without acknowledging the radical elements of the Labour programme or that to win an independence referendum they need Labour voters to support independence to guarantee a majority. This just helps the Tories.

In fact, the policy differences between Labour and the SNP are relatively small, both largely having what in broad terms can be described as ‘left social democratic’ policies. The Scottish Green Party also shares many similar programmatic elements of the left of social democracy.

SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon has made it clear during the election debate that SNP MPs at Westminster would ensure in the event of a parliament where no party had a majority that they would aim to keep Boris Johnson’s Tory party out of power and would support a minority Labour government, if it agreed to oppose nuclear weapons and allow another independence referendum. Such a prospect is not a mere abstract possibility to judge from the current state of the opinion polls. The left of the Labour Party in England will need to get their heads around what possibilities such an agreement might open up.

Tactical voting?

It is impossible to endorse as a whole any of the left of centre parties standing in the general election.

Labour has some elements of a radical social programme, much of which does not apply in Scotland due to devolution, but Labour is against independence and supports nuclear weapons – while the Scottish Labour Party is well to the right of the Corbyn leadership. Labour’s position on EU membership could still lead to the UK state leaving the EU, while Scotland votes to remain.

The SNP are for independence, against Brexit and nuclear weapons, but are also strongly tied to the oil and gas industries and the neo-liberal ‘Growth Commission’ report. Nevertheless, the SNP are prepared to countenance support for a minority Corbyn-led government.

The Scottish Green Party are agitating around the climate crisis and support independence, but in the first-past-the-post Westminster electoral system have little track record of success and only a small chance of achieving even a modest level of support, say above 5%. The SGP are essentially standing as a protest vote against Labour and the SNP in circumstances where the Tories or LibDems could be a threat.

It goes without saying that in Scotland the LibDems are not an option than any Scottish socialist could seriously countenance, with their support for austerity, hostility to independence and support for nuclear weapons (Scottish MP and LibDem leader, Jo Swinson, said without hesitation that she would fire nuclear weapons and she has a track record of support for the most heinous policies of the Tories in the 2010-15 coalition which she has only belatedly ‘apologised’ for).

Despite huge majority hostility to Boris Johnson (and Donald Trump) in Scotland and the loss of Tory leader Ruth Davidson from the scene, the Scottish Tories remain a threat and have become the focus for both the pro-Brexit and unionist viewpoint in Scotland.

Of the 59 Scottish constituencies, 46 are considered marginal by polling expert John Curtice with less than 10 percentage points between the first and second parties in the 2017 general election, which resulted in the following overall picture:

In the two Scotland-only opinion polls so far, the current party strengths is put at:
SNP around 40%,
Tories around 27%,
Labour around 18%,
LibDems around 12%,
with the Brexit Party and Greens on a couple of percent.

Only a relatively small movement in votes would result in quite a few Scottish seats changing hands

ECOSOCIALIST TACTICAL VOTING GUIDE IN SCOTLAND

Faced with this complex picture, this is therefore my suggestion of how left wing/ecosocialist Scottish voters could use tactical voting based on the different constituencies and the following principles:

1. Drive the Scottish Tories out of Westminster – a tactical vote for the SNP in the 13 constituencies held by the Tories

This is a clear choice – the Tories have been driven out of Scotland before and can be driven out again. The SNP are the clear challenger in each of the 13 Tory seats and we should therefore vote SNP here: Aberdeen South; Angus; Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock; Banff and Buchan; Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk; Dumfries and Galloway; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale; East Renfrewshire; Gordon; Moray; Ochil and South Perthshire; Stirling; West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine.

2. Support Corbyn – vote Labour in the six constituencies gained by Labour in 2017

While Labour is a unionist party which doesn’t support Scottish independence, it is in the wider interests of the British left to deliver the largest possible Labour contingent at Westminster and certainly not reduce its support. The six individual Labour MPs winning seats in 2017 may not be particularly left wing, but they have all supported Corbyn at Westminster and stand by the many progressive elements of the Labour Manifesto.

Individual SNP and SGP candidates may be worthy individuals, but we need to look at the wider picture and vote tactically to help Labour retain their MPs in these constituencies: Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill; East Lothian; Glasgow North East; Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath; Midlothian; Rutherglen and Hamilton West.

3. No vote for Ian Murray in Edinburgh South – vote SNP or SGP instead

The MP for Edinburgh South, Ian Murray, is different to the other Scottish Labour MPs. He was the sole MP elected under the Labour banner in 2015 and held his seat in 2017 with the largest majority of any in Scotland, partly on the back of Tory votes in what is quite a middle-class constituency. Since Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the Labour Party in 2015, Murray has steadfastly sought to undermine and oppose every single thing Corbyn stands for. A half-hearted attempt by the Unite union to deselect Murray in the run up to the election was easily thwarted by Murray’s machine, but nevertheless it all shows how dreadful his politics are and how he stands against virtually every radical policy in the Labour Manifesto. A protest vote for the SNP or SGP candidates in Edinburgh South is certainly appropriate!

4. Support a protest vote for the Scottish Green Party in other constituencies, where they are running a credible campaign and where there is no risk of letting Tories or LibDems in

A modest protest vote for the SGP will help keep the Climate Crisis in the centre of attention, but only if there is little risk of letting Tories or LibDems in or where there is not a better SNP or Labour candidate with a strong track record of support for environmental or other issues. Despite the SGP standing 22 candidates in total, there are only a handful constituencies where this is possible. An example would be Glasgow Central where there is little risk of the Tories winning, and, as the location close to COP26, a strong protest vote for SGP will help build the environmental movement.

However, in Edinburgh East the SNP candidate is Tommy Shepperd, a prominent former Labour activist and socialist at Westminster, and we would suggest voting for him in that constituency. In Edinburgh South West, the Tories are a serious challenger, only 1% behind sitting SNP MP Joanna Cherry who led the legal action at the Supreme Court, and we would recommend supporting her rather than the Green to avoid any risk of the Tories taking the seat.

Where the Greens are running against a sitting LibDem MP and the SNP are the main challenger we would recommend voting SNP instead – this includes East Dunbartonshire and Edinburgh West.

As well as Glasgow Central, other constituencies where the Greens are running and are worth considering voting for include: Falkirk; Glasgow North; Glasgow South; Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey; Linlithgow and East Falkirk; Livingston; West Dunbartonshire

5. Elsewhere: vote SNP or Labour, depending on the qualities of the individual candidates and the risk of letting in the Tories or LibDems

In practice this probably means voting SNP in most other constituencies, including those four seats held by the LibDems, where the SNP is the main challenger: Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross; East Dunbartonshire; Edinburgh West; Orkney and Shetland.

In other seats where the Labour candidate might be considered strongly left wing/pro-Corbyn and there is no risk of letting in the Tories or LibDems in, it is worth considering a vote for Labour over the SNP but in most cases the SNP candidate is better placed. It is worth singling out Chris Stephens in Glasgow South West as a left-wing SNP sitting MP worthy of support, though with only a small majority over Labour it would be understandable why some on the left might prefer Labour.

Of necessity, because it is tactical, this is a controversial list and readers in Scotland are encouraged to post their views or alternatives in the comments box below.

Mike Picken, 5 December 2019

• Posted on 5^th December 2019 :
http://socialistresistance.org/general-election-scotland-at-crossroads/18783

---